Brent Pitchford^1,2 (), Inga María Ólafsdóttir^3,2, Marelle Maeekalle^1,2, Heida Maria Sigurdardottir^1,2; ¹University of Iceland, ²Icelandic Vision Lab, ³Reykjavik University

Object similarity may not be an abstract construct that can be defined outside of the operational definition of task context. We asked people to assess the similarity of objects by rating their semantic relatedness, overall shape, and internal features. Shape similarity was assessed by rating object silhouettes with no internal features. Featural similarity was assessed by rating grayscale objects where global shape was distorted. Object pairs were either different at the basic level (e.g., hairbrush, pipe) or at the subordinate level (e.g., two different bowties). Semantic similarity of objects differing at the basic level was measured by rating similarity in meaning of word pairs. We then assessed to which degree semantics, shape, and features predicted a) explicit judgments of visual similarity of objects, b) implicit measures of object similarity as assessed by object foraging, and c) similarity in an object space derived from activations of a deep layer of a convolutional neural network trained on object classification. Explicit judgments of visual similarity were predicted both by features and shapes, but not semantics. Unlike explicit judgments, implicit object similarity depended on whether people searched for target objects among distractors of the same or different category. If targets and distractors differed at the basic level, both shape and semantic similarity predicted unique variability in foraging not accounted for by features. If objects belonged to the same category, featural similarity predicted unique variability not accounted for by shape. Contrary to previous suggestions that neural networks are primarily feature-based, shape uniquely explained variability in object space distance not accounted for by features in cases where objects differed at the basic level. Different information therefore contributes to people’s explicit vs. implicit judgments of object qualities – and can also be distinguished from measures of similarity extracted from artificial neural networks trained on object classification.

Acknowledgements: This work was supported by The Icelandic Research Fund (Grants No. 228916 and 218092) and the University of Iceland Research Fund