Attention enhances figure-ground segmentation signals in visual cortex

Poster Presentation 23.429: Saturday, May 16, 2026, 8:30 am – 12:30 pm, Pavilion
Session: Attention: Neural

Michael Epstein1,2 (mlepstein88@gmail.com), Emil Olsson3, Juneau Wang2, Karen Tian2, Brian Maniscalco3, Jennifer Motzer2, Diana Gamboa2, Angela Shen3, Minh Nguyen3, Meera Sriram3, Sydney Liu3, Olenka Graham Castaneda3, Maggie Zhang3, Vanessa Wu3, Richard Brown4,5, Victor Lamme6, Hakwan Lau7, Biyu He1, Jan Brascamp8, Ned Block1, David Chalmers1, Megan Peters3, Rachel Denison2; 1New York University, 2Boston University, 3University of California, Irvine, 4LaGuardia Community College, 5The Graduate Center, CUNY, 6University of Amsterdam, 7Institute for Basic Science, 8Michigan State University

Background: Figure-ground processing is a critical early step of object and scene perception. Although attention has been suggested to enhance figure-ground processing, there is limited neuroimaging work testing how attention influences visual cortical activity during figure-ground texture segmentation. In an fMRI experiment (27 participants with four sessions each), we tested whether spatial attention cues boost figure-ground processing in early visual cortex. Methods: Participants viewed four texture-defined figure-ground oval stimuli in each quadrant of the screen (3x4°, 5° from fixation, 250 ms duration). Textures were composed of parallel line elements tilted +/-45°. Oval figures within the texture were defined by orthogonal line orientations relative to the background. Stimuli were independently balanced across trials to be figure-present or figure-absent, have vertical or horizontal oval orientation, and display at one of five thresholded strength levels, based on the length of the texture line elements. Participants were pre-cued on each trial to attend a given quadrant and report the orientation of the oval in that quadrant, along with their subjective visibility of the oval (behavioral results to be reported elsewhere). Results: Given findings that figure-ground processing shows a center-surround structure, we grouped voxels based on their mean signal across conditions—either responding more to the figure than the background (figure-positive voxels) or more to the background than the figure (figure-negative voxels). We evaluated how attention affected BOLD responses within these two groups of voxels, comparing trials in which the oval figure was present vs. absent. In figure-positive voxels, attention increased responses to the figure relative to the background, whereas in figure-negative voxels, attention reduced responses to the figure relative to the background. Conclusions: Our results suggest that attention facilitates figure-ground processing by both enhancing the figure and suppressing the ground within visual cortex.

Acknowledgements: Templeton World Charity Foundation 0567 to BH, JB, NB, DC, MP, and RD, startup funding from the University of California Irvine and support from the Canadian Institute of Advanced Research to MP, startup funding from Boston University to RD, and BU UROP funding to DG.