Functionally distinct sub-regions of the parahippocampal place area revealed by model-based neural control
Undergraduate Just-In-Time Abstract
Poster Presentation 33.350: Sunday, May 17, 2026, 8:30 am – 12:30 pm, Banyan Breezeway
Session: Undergraduate Just-In-Time 2
Schedule of Events | Search Abstracts | Symposia | Talk Sessions | Poster Sessions
Ranjani Koushik1,2 (), Alex Abate3, Frederik Kamps4, N. Apurva Ratan Murty1,2; 1Cognition and Brain Science, Georgia Institute of Technology, 2Center for Computational Cognition, Georgia Institute of Technology, 3Harvard Medical School, 4University of Edinburgh
The parahippocampal place area (PPA) is central to the brain’s scene processing system, yet its finer-grained functional organization has remained easier to describe anatomically than functionally. If the PPA contains functionally distinct subregions, those subregions should reflect distinct computations, require distinct computational models, and be independently dissociable with distinct images. Here, we integrated data-driven analyses of neural response structure, subregion computational models, in silico hypothesis testing, and closed-loop experimental validation to define the roles of PPA subregions in scene processing. We first used data-driven clustering to identify PPA voxel groups with similar responses to a large image set (185 images, 20 repetitions per image, N = 4). Across participants, more than 95% of response variance was captured by just two anterior-posterior clusters, consistent with prior work (Baldassano et al., 2013; Nasr et al., 2013; Cukur et al., 2016). To uncover what functionally distinguishes these subregions, we built ANN-based encoding models for each. The models predicted held-out responses well (R > 0.70, P < 0.00001) and identified image pairs expected to strongly drive one subregion while suppressing the other. We tested these model-derived predictions in a new pre-registered fMRI experiment (N=15), revealing a clear double dissociation: the anterior subregion responded stronger to sparse spatial layouts, whereas the posterior preferred images rich in objects and texture. We next asked whether this dissociation reflected a broader organizing principle across the scene-selective network. It did not— the pattern was specific to PPA and did not generalize reliably to other scene-selective regions, including OPA and MPA/RSC (F(2,22) ≥ 14.62, p = .001). Together, these findings reveal reproducible anterior-posterior functional organization within human PPA, with a functional dimensionality of at least two. We further provide localizers for both subregions, computational models for each, and initial insight into their roles in scene recognition.