V1 Fovea-Centric Functional Architecture in Humans with Neurotypical and Amblyopic Vision
Poster Presentation 33.420: Sunday, May 17, 2026, 8:30 am – 12:30 pm, Pavilion
Session: Functional Organization of Visual Pathways: Neuroimaging
Schedule of Events | Search Abstracts | Symposia | Talk Sessions | Poster Sessions
Zexi Chen1 (), Marianna Elisa Schmidt2,3, Shahin Nasr4,5, Cherlyn Joan Ng1,6, Daniel Ts’o7; 1University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA, 2Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany, 3Max Planck School of Cognition, Leipzig, Germany, 4Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA, 5Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA, 6Brunson Center for Translational Vision Research, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA, 7SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA
Introduction: Intra-areal functional connections (FCs) within V1 are thought to support coherent visual perception across the visual field. These connections, however, are not uniform; rather, they exhibit systematic heterogeneity that may help explain known perceptual asymmetries. In this study, we tested whether intra-V1 FC varies between foveal and peripheral regions as suggested based on foveal confluence—the dense clustering of foveal representations in V1. We then asked whether this organizational principle is altered in amblyopia, a developmental disorder that disproportionately affects foveal vision. Methods: In Experiment 1, 33 adults (aged 22-43) with neurotypical vision were scanned during resting state (eyes closed) in a 3T MRI (3mm isotropic); 20 of these participants also completed a separate 7T session (1mm isotropic). Experiment 2 included 4 neurotypical controls (aged 24-47) and 7 individuals with amblyopia (aged 27-60; 4 with strabismus and 3 with anisometropia) scanned at 7T. For all participants, the V1 surface representing the central 10° was segmented into 16 equal-area subregions. Intra-V1 FC was quantified using partial correlations between vertices across these subregions (Schmidt et al., 2025). Results: In Experiment 1, regions representing more foveal visual field locations showed significantly stronger FC with one another than with regions representing equivalent eccentricities in the periphery (p<10-4). This pattern was robust across both field strengths and detectable across deep, middle, and superficial layers at 7T. Our preliminary results in Experiment 2 showed that, compared to controls, strabismic amblyopia showed both reduced foveal bias and a global reduction in intra-V1 FC, whereas anisometropic amblyopia preserved overall FC magnitude but showed reduced foveal specificity. In both amblyopia subtypes, the weakened foveal bias was more apparent in superficial layers. Conclusion: These findings reveal a pronounced foveal-centric organization of V1 FC and demonstrate its vulnerability to disruptions in balanced binocular vision early in life.
Acknowledgements: This work was supported by NIH NEI (R01 EY030434), and by the MGH/HST Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging. Crucial resources were made available by a NIH Shared Instrumentation Grant S10-RR019371.