Abstracts are submitted through MyVSS. Each member may submit one individual abstract as first author. The first author must be a current member (for 2018) in good standing.
All first authors must register for the meeting in order to present his/her poster or talk. Author substitutions for posters require pre-approval by the VSS Program Committee and will be handled on a case-by-case basis. Substitutions for talks are not allowed. Each registered attendee may present only once at the meeting.
You must sign up for membership first, before submitting your abstract. Accepted abstracts will be published in the meeting program and in the online Journal of Vision.
Abstracts are limited to 300 words. This does not include title, authors and affiliations. Additional space is provided for funding acknowledgements.
Your abstract should consist of an introduction, methods and results sections, and a conclusion. It is not required that the sections be explicitly labeled as such. It is, however, important that each abstract contains sufficiently detailed descriptions of the methods and the results. Please do not submit an abstract of work that you are planning to do. Such abstracts will not be accepted!
Please complete your submission carefully. All abstracts must be in final form. No typos or other errors can be corrected after the deadline; however, authors may edit abstracts online until the submission deadline.
Each submitter is allowed to upload a one-page PDF file of supplementary material to help the Abstract Review Committee evaluate his/her abstract. The PDF can include any kind of information that the reviewers might find helpful. Submission of a supplemental PDF is not mandatory, and reviewers are not obliged to take account of information provided in the PDF. We especially encourage authors with a preference for a talk presentation, or for a travel award, to submit such a PDF. Ideally, the PDF should contain material that convinces the reviewers of the high quality of the data. A figure with an illustration of the methods, or a graph with the major results are ideal ways to achieve that goal. Make sure that you describe all figures.
The Abstract Review Committee evaluates all submitted abstracts. Abstracts submitted for talk sessions and/or travel fellowships are assessed by two reviewers; all other abstracts are assessed by one reviewer. Reviewers are chosen whose area of expertise matches the topic of your abstract. You should make three suggestions for reviewers, and those suggestions will at least be partially taken into account when selecting reviewers.
When making these reviewer suggestions, you should under any circumstances avoid reviewers which do have a conflict of interest. A conflict of interest exists if you (1) are related to the reviewer, (2) are working at the same institution, (3) have published together in the last 5 years, (4) have a current joint research project. We ask all our reviewers to take these issues very serious and notify us of conflicts of interest. If you are unsure whether a conflict exists, simply ask the potential reviewer about it.
Abstract scoring is completed prior to the Board Meeting in late January, at which the abstracts are scheduled into talk and poster sessions.
Abstracts submitted for talk sessions and/or travel fellowships are reviewed on a 5-point scale. Each reviewer’s ratings get normalized before averaging them across reviewers. The reviewers have the option to recommend rejection of an abstract.
Abstracts submitted for poster sessions are reviewed by a single reviewer, who either approves the abstract for presentation, or makes a recommendation to reject the abstract.
Criteria for the rejection of abstracts are a lack of results, no or fatally flawed methods, incomprehensibility, or repetition of well-known literature. Abstracts that are recommended for rejection by at least one reviewer will be considered for rejection by the Board of Directors. Abstracts will only be finally rejected if a 2/3 majority of directors at the board meeting votes for rejection.
Based on our experience, there are always some abstracts that fulfill these criteria, and these will indeed be rejected.
Notices of Acceptance
After the reviewing process and after the abstracts are scheduled for the meeting, authors will be informed about the outcome of the reviewing process. All correspondence, including notification of abstract acceptance and details for poster and talk presentations, will be sent to the Corresponding Author (submitting author) via email. The corresponding author shall be responsible for informing all contributing authors of any related correspondence.
Scheduling Abstracts into Talks and Posters
The board of directors of VSS meets at the end of January to schedule presentations for the meeting. Abstracts are divided up into thematically organized sessions and according to presentation preference. (See Presentation Preference Definitions below). Because there are usually more requests for talks than slots available, the reviewers’ ratings will primarily determine which abstracts will be assigned to the talk sessions. Under very rare circumstances will the board make small adjustments to make sure that the talks in a single session fit well together, or to prevent a session being dominated by a single laboratory.
- talk preferred (if you are not chosen to give a talk, you may be chosen to give a poster)
- poster preferred (you would be willing to give a talk if asked to do so)
- poster only (you are not willing to give a talk under any circumstances)
All accepted abstracts will be printed in the meeting abstract booklet. All abstracts presented at the conference will be published in the online Journal of Vision.
Abstract Submissions deadline is December 1, 2017.
Submit an Abstract through MyVSS.