Bethany B. Jantz^1,2, Madison L. Fankhanel³, Dana A. Hayward^2,3, Craig S. Chapman^1,2; ¹University of Alberta, Faculty of Kinesiology Sport, and Recreation, ²University of Alberta, Neuroscience and Mental Health Institute, ³University of Alberta, Department of Psychology

Recently we showed that 2 players in a simple online card game were better able to predict each other's intentions when cooperating than competing (Ma et al, 2023), which also generated spontaneous differences in mouse movement. However, online interactions using cursor icons have limitations in representing physical presence and conveying social cues. Thus, the current study aims to explore the influence of social contexts (competition and cooperation) on decision-making and intention prediction when two players engage in the same card game in person. Participant dyads played a card game six times under two social contexts: competing or cooperating (3 games each). When competing, only the player with the highest score earns points. When cooperating, participants split points evenly if they reach a combined threshold. Each game consisted of 8 turns, and each turn participants could obtain points by collecting goal-aligned cards and/or correctly guessing the other person’s goal. We tracked card and guess point performance, as well as recorded gaze and hand movements. We predict in-person play will match online play: cooperating dyads will have higher guess scores and move more confidently (less time and hand distance traveled). Preliminary data revealed 1) As designed, card scores remain consistent across games and condition; 2) Guess scores improve across turns as information is acquired; 3) Guess scores are impacted by social context but not in the same way as the online study. Further analysis will reveal if in-person gameplay is genuinely altering the strategies players use to help and interfere with the communication of intention and will consider how gaze and hand movement contribute to this communication. Overall, we believe that cooperation facilitates the communication of intention during gameplay, but may be richer and more nuanced when people are playing in-person than when they played the same game online.

Acknowledgements: NSERC; AGRI